Quito v. Compania De Vapores Ocean Breeze S.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the jury’s verdict and judgment are fully supported by competent evidence; and that the claimed error was harmless at best. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stecher v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla.1971); Chrysler v. Department of Prof'l Reg., 627 So.2d 31, 34-35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Scurry v. State, 490 So.2d 223, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Arlen House E., Inc. v. Lowenstern, 364 So.2d 87, 88 *1179(Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We therefore affirm the judgment under review.
Affirmed.
GREEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chrysler v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Scurry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Arlen House East, Inc. v. LowensternDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978