Legal Opinion

Quito v. Compania De Vapores Ocean Breeze S.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 27, 1999No. 98-947Published

1Per curiam

Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the jury’s verdict and judgment are fully supported by competent evidence; and that the claimed error was harmless at best. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stecher v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla.1971); Chrysler v. Department of Prof'l Reg., 627 So.2d 31, 34-35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Scurry v. State, 490 So.2d 223, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Arlen House E., Inc. v. Lowenstern, 364 So.2d 87, 88 *1179(Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We therefore affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

GREEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chrysler v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Scurry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Arlen House East, Inc. v. LowensternDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978