Samuel G. Dykstra and Michelle L. Bahus v. The City of Hammond
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Samuel G. Dykstra and Michelle L. Ba-hus appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Hammond. They contend that the Hammond Ordinances regulating firearms that are at issue violate Indiana Code section 35-47-11.1-2 and “adversely affect” them as individuals who possess licenses to carry a handgun and others similarly situated, so summary judgment in favor of the City was erroneous. We find that Dykstra, Bahus, and others similarly situated have not been adversely affected because the City of Hammond has not adopted or enforced an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Indiana State Board of Dental Examiners v. JuddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re the Guardianship of E.N.Indiana Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jason Taylor v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jereme Lee Wall v. Alfred H. Plummer, IIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- City of Evansville and The Evansville Department of Parks and Recreation v. Benjamin A. MagenheimerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Michael Kevin Mallory v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- City of Evansville and The Evansville Department of Parks and Recreation v. Benjamin A. MagenheimerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.