Buckner v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge.
Buckner was charged with possession of a prohibited weapon — machine gun, an unregistered firearm, and unregistered am*1155munition. After the trial court denied her motion to suppress evidence, Buckner entered a conditional guilty plea (pursuant to Super.Ct.Crim.lt. 11(a)(2)) to all counts. On appeal she challenges only the denial of her suppression motion. We affirm.
I
On March 19, 1991, Hoben, a Special Agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, observed a confidential informant make two illegal purchases of narcotics at 916 Varney Street. On both occasions, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re M.E.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- United States v. StromickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- State v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- In Re MEBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993