Legal Opinion

Buckner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1992No. 91-CM-900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Senior Judge.

Buckner was charged with possession of a prohibited weapon — machine gun, an unregistered firearm, and unregistered am*1155munition. After the trial court denied her motion to suppress evidence, Buckner entered a conditional guilty plea (pursuant to Super.Ct.Crim.lt. 11(a)(2)) to all counts. On appeal she challenges only the denial of her suppression motion. We affirm.

I

On March 19, 1991, Hoben, a Special Agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, observed a confidential informant make two illegal purchases of narcotics at 916 Varney Street. On both occasions, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re M.E.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. StromickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1989
  4. State v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
  5. In Re MEBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API