Hatfield v. Straus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Edwin F. Hatfield and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 10th day of December, 1906, denying the plaintiffs’ motion for-an injunction.pendente lite-and vacating a preliminary injunction theretofore granted.
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, J.:
The plaintiff are the owners of the premises Ho. 149 West Thirty-fourth street, which have b'een used and occupied by them for many years past as a private dwelling! The defendants Straus, doing business under the firm name of It. H. Macy & Co., are the-lessees of the premises on the northwest corner of Broadway ánd Thirty-fourth street, eastward of and immediately adjoining pláin-. tiffs’ propérty, and occupy the same for the purposes. of a laige department store.
Upon the application of B. II. Macy & Co. the board of estimate 'and apportionment of the city of Hew York, on the-6th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Callanan v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Fanning v. . OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Glaessner v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Paige v. . Schenectady Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Acme Realty Co. v. SchinasiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co. v. . SteersNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Stanley v. Jay Street Connecting RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1917