Legal Opinion

State v. Patrick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 8, 1978No. T 44858, CA 8201; No. T 44730, CA 8202; No. T 45401, CA 8203Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

In our former opinion we noted that the trial court was "clearly in error on the merits,” but stated that we could reach the question only as to State v. Connorton (CA 8203), which we reversed and remanded. See State v. Patrick, 32 Or App 35, 37, 573 P2d 1259 (1978). We dismissed the appeals as to State v. Patrick (CA 8201) and State v. Spinney (CA 8202) on the grounds that the orders appealed from were not appealable. As the opinion on reconsideration in State v. Thomas, 34 Or App 187, 578 P2d 452 (1978), points out, we were in error in so holding.

Reconsideration allowed. Former opinion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API