People v. Jackson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to comply with CPL 270.10 and, therefore, his contention that he was denied his constitutional (US Const 6th, 14th Amends) right to a trial by a jury of his peers has not been preserved for our review (see, People v Parks, 41 NY2d 36, 40-43; People v Consolazio, 40 NY2d 446, 455, cert denied 433 US 914). Moreover, defendant failed to specify facts upon which a statutory (Judiciary Law § 500), a due process or an equal protection violation could be premised (see, People v Guzman, 60 NY2d 403, 410, cert denied 466 US 951).
Viewing the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ConsolazioNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BongarzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. GuzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SchwimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. SchwimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.