Legal Opinion

Ingram v. . Corbit

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In June, 1914, E. T. Corbit, deceased, executed a lease to plaintiff for one acre of land for ten years, and agreed to erect a slaughter-house and did a well thereon. The plaintiff delivered to Corbit his note in the sum of $500, secured by the chattel mortgage, in payment of the ten years rental. It is alleged in the complaint and is admitted by the demurrer that pursuant to the contract Corbit enclosed an acre of land with a wire fence, erected the slaughter-house thereon, and dug the well; that plaintiff went into possession and remained in possession during the lifetime of Corbit, who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Morton v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Fisher v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Thigpen v. Kinston Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Lee v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kent v. HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Kent v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Holloway v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Kent v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API