Benedict v. Howell
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why a m indamus should not issue.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Depue, J.
A mandamus is applied for in this case, to be directed to the judge of the first District Court of the city of Newark, commanding him to send up to the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Essex, a statement of the case in the said cause.
District Courts in the city of Newark were established by the act of 1873. Acts, 1873, p. 245.
By Section 11, it is provided that the cause may be tried by the judge or by a jury, and the determination of the judge, or the verdict of the jury, is made final and conclusive upon questions of fact, except that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sikes v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Delavan v. Boardman & WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Haskins v. SeborNew York Supreme Court · 1801
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeHart v. BambrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- JH Becker, Inc. v. Marlboro Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Aparin v. County of GloucesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.