Legal Opinion

Klenk v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1989No. 64A03-8906-PC-246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Presiding Judge.

Klenk pled guilty to two counts of rape, one a Class B felony and one a Class A felony.

He now appeals from denial of his petition for post conviction relief and raises three issues.

First, he asserts the court failed to adequately advise him of his right to confrontation before accepting the plea. We agree that the right encompasses both the cross examination of witnesses and their physical confrontation by the accused. See, e.g., Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (1987), 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40. For this reason the better practice for a court in preparing to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Coates v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Mathis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Douglas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Frazier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stamm v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Cates v. Superintendent, Indiana Youth CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  3. Hampton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Klenk v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API