Legal Opinion

Crane Co. v. Pneumatic Signal Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Motion to dismiss the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtNash, J.

The complaint alleges that the mechanic’s lien sought to he foreclosed was filed after the adjudication in bankruptcy.

It was held in the case of Matter of Dey, 3 Nat. Bank. Rep. 305, that any lien to be recognized by the Bankruptcy Court as a valid lien on property, which passes from the bankrupt to the assignee in bankruptcy by virtue of the proceedings in bankruptcy, must be a lien at the time of the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy. This decision was rendered under the provisions of the former Bankrupt Law, but the principle is as applicable under the present as under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John P. Kane Co. v. . KinneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Armstrong v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. In re DeyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1872
  4. Lazzari v. HavensNew York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chickasaw Hotel Co. v. C. B. Barker Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re FranklinDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1907
  3. Eberle v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API