Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
492 U.S. 96 (1989)
HOFFMAN, TRUSTEE
v.
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF INCOME MAINTENANCE ET AL.
No. 88-412.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 19, 1989
Decided June 23, 1989
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Martin W. Hoffman, pro se, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Deputy Solicitor General Merrill argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Bryson, Assistant Attorney General Bolton, and Christopher J. Wright. Clarine Nardi Riddle, Acting Attorney General of Connecticut, argued the cause for…
Also in this document: Judgment of the Court; Concurrence; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · Marshall; Dissent · Stevens.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.