Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Velasquez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 2016No. 04-15-00239-CRPublished

1DissentMarialyn Barnard, Justice

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the trial court’s order granting Velasquez’s motion to suppress. Although I agree with the majority that article 28.01 requires the trial court to provide the defendant, defense counsel, and the State’s attorney with notice of the time and place of a pretrial hearing, I believe the State was on notice that the trial court had discretion to consider the defendant’s pending motion to suppress at the April 13, 2015 trial setting. I also believe article 28.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (the “Code”) does not entitle the State to notice of “what…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. State v. Suzanne Wolfe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API