Legal Opinion
Jones v. Lamarque
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2002No. 00-56359; D.C. No. CV-00-04413-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
California state prisoner Clerence Jones appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm, see Welch v. Fritz, 909 F.2d 1330, 1331 (9th Cir.1990) (concluding that appeals court may affirm for any reason finding support in the record).
The district court dismissed Jones’ first section 2254 petition, which alleged denial of the right to meaningful self-representa*878tion, as unexhausted because it failed to allege that the claim had been presented to the state’s highest court. Jones then filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Todd Hiivala v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Douglas James v. R.A. Giles, Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. SarnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James Tillema v. Miles Long, Warden Frankie Sue Del PapaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. Lamarque, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2002