Legal Opinion

Aultman v. Utsey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 21, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Izlar, J., Abbeville, January, 1893. Action by C. Aultman & Co. against W. B. Utsey and others, the heirs at law of Mattie L. Utsey.

Read the full summary

Before Izlar, J., Abbeville, January, 1893. Action by C. Aultman & Co. against W. B. Utsey and others, the heirs at law of Mattie L. Utsey. A. J. Salinas & Sons were made parties defendant, they being in possession under a judicial sale made in January, 1892, in foreclosure of a mortgage given by Mattie L. Utsey to A. J. Salinas & Son in January, 1888. The plaintiffs claimed under sheriff’s deed of September, 1889, the property having been sold under judgment against F. M. Pope, entered in February, 1887.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

Most of the matters out of which this case arises were once before in this court, and in the report of that case it appears that the plaintiffs, being creditors of Francis Marion Pope, sued him to judgment, and under the execution in the case, had a house and lot of the judgment debtor in the town of Ninety-Six levied and sold, and at the sheriff’s sale, on September 2, 1889, bid off the lot and took *306sheriff’s title for the same. There were proceedings to set aside certain conveyances of the said house and lot, as fraudulent and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gadsden v. DesportesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The STATE v. GoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Howard v. KirtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Bethea v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API