Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Unity Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for penalty. Before Judge Longley. City court of LaGrange. July 18, 1903.

1Opinion of the Court

Turnee, J....... 1. “An amendment to a motion for a new trial, which has upon it an entry to the effect that it was ‘ allowed ’ by the judge, with nothing else to indicate an approval of its grounds, is not sufficiently verified to authorize this court to deal with the assignments of error therein.” Dunn v. State, 116 Ga. 515. See also Jackson v. State, Id. 835, and cit.

2. The evidence adduced on the trial of this case being directly conflicting as to a controlling issue of fact, the verdict in favor of the prevailing party in the court below will be allowed to stand, since it has received…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cable Co. v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Pollard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API