Legal Opinion

Neve v. Davis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2009No. 24857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] A jury found that repayment of a gambling debt was a part of the consideration for a promissory note executed by Gerald Neve in favor of the Donald L. Davis Living Trust. In accordance with the jury verdict, the circuit court voided the note pursuant to a statute that prohibits enforcement of notes given in full or partial consideration of gambling debts. Neve appeals the circuit court’s subsequent entry of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.rno.v.) in favor of the Davis Trust. We reverse and remand for reinstatement of the judgment entered on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Waite v. FrankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Beverage Co. v. Villa Marie Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bayer v. BurkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neve v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Viva Capital Trust v. GarrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Viva Capital Trust v. GarrettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API