State v. DeKeyser

Jerry DeKeyser appeals an order denying his motion to suppress other acts evidence, a judgment of conviction for sexual contact under § 948.02(2), Stats., and an order denying postconvic*439tion relief. DeKeyser contends that his counsel was ineffective for failing to stipulate to elements of his offense in order to avoid the introduction of other acts evidence.1 We conclude that DeKeyser's attorney was deficient for not knowing about the possibility of and failing to propose such a stipulation as a means of excluding other acts evidence, and we further conclude that such deficiency was…