Yeager v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appellant, defendant below, was convicted in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia of the crime of embezzlement. Erom the judgment, this appeal was prosecuted.
It appears that defendant was in the employ of the Washington Electric Company as bookkeeper, salesman, and collector; that it was a part of his duty to make deposits in the bank of all accrued money in the form of checks and otherwise; and that, for the purpose of deposit, he was authorized to indorse the name of the company on the checks so deposited. Instead of depositing the checks involved in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Ex parte HibbsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1886
- Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. KroegerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hotel Kingkade v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Quick Service Box Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Thelma L. Selvidge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Driver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.