Legal Opinion

Handbags v. Lifschultz Fast Freight

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 19, 1973Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fritz W. Alexander, II, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in this action against an interstate carrier for goods *1094lost in transit. The goods were shipped under a uniform straight bill of lading in the form prescribed by the Interstate Commerce Commission. On the motion, defendant does not dispute any of the essential elements of plaintiff’s cause of action. Instead it cross-moves to amend its answer to include as a defense plaintiff’s failure to file a written notice of claim within nine months after the time scheduled for delivery as required by section 2b of the bill of lading.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. James G. McCarrick Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Minot Beverage Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  3. Greyvan Lines, Inc. v. NesmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Bond Stores, Inc. v. Overland Package Freight Service, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939
  5. Blaisdell v. American Railway Express Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API