Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Bergen Associates, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1937Published

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

Plaintiffs, the vendees in a contract with defendant vendor for the purchase of certain lots in a real estate subdivision, sue to recover back the moneys paid by them under the contract and for the establishment of a vendees’ lien upon the lots in question. They also seek a reformation of the contract in certain respects, which the defendant does not oppose.

The issue involves questions both of fact and of law, and under both, in my opinion, plaintiffs are entitled to prevail.

The factual question involved is one of the performance by defendant of certain of its covenants for the improvement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cameron-Hawn Realty Co. v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Brede v. . Rosedale Terrace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Jackson ex dem. Trowbridge v. DunsbaghNew York Supreme Court · 1799
  4. Feldblum v. Laurelton Land Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Feldblum v. . Laurelton Land CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API