Legal Opinion

People v. Jiggetts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed July 7, 2003, on the ground that the sentence is both illegal and excessive.

*506Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was not adequately advised that he would be subject to the maximum term of postrelease supervision is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not move either to withdraw his plea either before sentencing or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Gregory, 16 AD3d 597 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 886 [2005]; People v Dale, 14 AD3d 712…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. WronkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. People v. RedcrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DelgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API