Legal Opinion

State v. Ramos

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2022No. 9-21-32PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Ramos,

2022-Ohio-886.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MARION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 9-21-32 v. RICK RAMOS, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Marion Municipal Court Trial Court No. TRC 19-7325 Judgment Affirmed Date of Decision: March 21, 2022 APPEARANCES: Geoffrey Arthur Spall for Appellant Jeff Ratliff for Appellee Case No. 9-21-32 MILLER, J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant, Rick Ramos, appeals the September 8, 2021 judgment of the Marion Municipal Court. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. I. Facts & Procedural…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HopkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Parma v. PerottiOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. BarkleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API