Legal Opinion

Kirkoff Bros. v. McCool

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1917No. 9,848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by John F. McCool, physician, against Kirkoff Brothers and McElwaine, employer, and the Prudential Casualty Company for medical treatment of an injured employe. Claim allowed, and employer and insurer appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

Fount Royston was an employe of appellant Kirkoff Brothers and McElwaine, and on July 12, 1916, was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Appellant Prudential Casualty Company was the insurance carrier for its coappellant under and in pursuance of the provisions of the Indiana Workmen’s Compensation Law. Appellee was employed to render medical treatment and, on November 14, 1916, filed with the Industrial Board of Indiana his claim for services and asked that it be allowed against both of the appellants.

The claim was duly presented and the board found that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mobley v. J. S. Rogers Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Hoffmann v. Brooks Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Union Hospital v. S. P. Brown & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API