Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pulitzer Publishing Co. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 10, 1941No. Nos. 37,053, 37,054, 37,055PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Three original proceedings, growing out of the same subject matter, present identical questions for our decision. In No. 37053 — certiorari — the Pulitzer Publishing Company asks us to quash a judgment of the St. Louis Circuit Court finding it guilty of contempt and fining it $2,000. In cases numbered 37054 and 37055 petitioners Fitzpatrick and Coghlan seek release by habeascorpus from sentences of imprisonment imposed for the same alleged contempt. Judge Rowe, who tried the contempt proceedings, has died; but in No. 37,053, in which alone he was a party to the record, the cause has been…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Craig v. HechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Osborne v. PurdomeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Gentry v. BeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Smith v. PaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Sullens v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Barrett v. GreitensMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API