Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Templeton

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 28, 1950No. Nos. 180-184Published

1Opinion of the Court

DARR, Chief Judge.

The defendant has filed motions under Rule 12(e), Federal Rules of 'Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., in each of these cases for a more definite statement of plaintiffs’ claims in relation to causes of action (called counts in the complaint) two, three and four of each of the complaints, these causes of action being substantially the same in each.

The first cause of action in each complaint is based upon a promissory note purporting to bear the defendant’s signature. He is presumed to know the circumstances connected with the execution and delivery of the note; and this is in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of Nova Scotia v. San MiguelDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1949
  2. Agricultural Lands, Inc. v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API