Yarwood v. DeLage
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*206OPINION
By THE COURT:
In the agreed statement of facts upon which this case was submitted to the trial court, the court was warranted in finding that plaintiff had sold the vehicle in question and delivered the possession thereof to Richard Hiscott and that a certificate of title therefor was not at the time transferred to said Hiscott by reason of the fact that it was in the possession of The Cleveland Trust Company which had a chattel mortgage lien on said vehicle as security for a loan thereon.
Subsequent to the sale and transfer of possession of the vehicle to Hiscott, he, the said Hiscott,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Atha v. BockiusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Vannoy Chevrolet Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Opinion No. (1988), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1988