Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Dickinson District Court. Action by Baldwin against the Board of Commissioners of Dickinson County, to recover certain taxes. Trial at the May Term, 1882, of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant Board brings the case here. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

The paramount question in this case is whether the lands described herein were subject to taxation. The facts are these: The lands were agricultural school lands. In 1876 they were sold to Haxtun and Baldwin under a time contract, one-eighth of the purchase-money being paid at the time of purchase, and the balance to be paid in seven annual payments. The first two annual payments were made, then the purchasers defaulted. Haxtun sold out his interest to Baldwin. The sale was thereafter, and in 1880, nominally canceled, the purchase bonds…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EmmertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Commissioners Douglas County v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Board of Regents v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Parker v. WinsorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  5. Prescott v. BeebeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Olmsted v. University of IllinoisIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Comstock v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. KahlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API