Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Schaefer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 11, 1990No. 1 CA-CR 88-382, 1 CA-CR 88-384Published

1Concurrence

FIDEL, Judge,

specially concurring:

I concur in all portions of the court’s opinion save one. The majority holds, and I agree, that the claim of right defense has been abolished by A.R.S. § 13-1801(A)(12). The majority adds, however, that even if the defense survives, this defendant could not assert it because the claim of right defense is unavailable to a defendant who denies that he took property by force. Here I disagree.

If we are correct in holding the defense abolished, the point is academic in this case. Yet it has significance in the larger context of justification defenses as a whole.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. PlewArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State v. SouleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API