State v. Schaefer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Concurrence
FIDEL, Judge,
specially concurring:
I concur in all portions of the court’s opinion save one. The majority holds, and I agree, that the claim of right defense has been abolished by A.R.S. § 13-1801(A)(12). The majority adds, however, that even if the defense survives, this defendant could not assert it because the claim of right defense is unavailable to a defendant who denies that he took property by force. Here I disagree.
If we are correct in holding the defense abolished, the point is academic in this case. Yet it has significance in the larger context of justification defenses as a whole.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. PlewArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. SouleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989