Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Arthur

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1963No. 19,618PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

The appellee, who was the plaintiff below, filed his complaint for alleged personal injuries against the appellant, defendant below. The cause was submitted to a jury, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the appellant, defendant below. Consistent judgment was rendered thereon; a motion for a new trial was filed by the appellee, and such motion for a new trial was sustained by the court. Appellant now appeals under the authority of §2-3201 (b), Burns’ 1946 Replacement, 1962 Supplement.

We have heretofore established the requirement that in sustaining a motion for a new trial the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newsom v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Rans v. the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. RIFE ETC. v. KarnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. Young Women's Christian Assn. of Terre HauteIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Salk v. WeinraubIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Singh v. INTERSTATE FINANCE OF IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Singh v. Interstate Finance of Indiana No. 2, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Rans v. Pennsylvania RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API