Harmon v. Arthur
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The appellee, who was the plaintiff below, filed his complaint for alleged personal injuries against the appellant, defendant below. The cause was submitted to a jury, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the appellant, defendant below. Consistent judgment was rendered thereon; a motion for a new trial was filed by the appellee, and such motion for a new trial was sustained by the court. Appellant now appeals under the authority of §2-3201 (b), Burns’ 1946 Replacement, 1962 Supplement.
We have heretofore established the requirement that in sustaining a motion for a new trial the trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newsom v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Rans v. the Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- RIFE ETC. v. KarnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Bailey v. KainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harris v. Young Women's Christian Assn. of Terre HauteIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Salk v. WeinraubIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Singh v. INTERSTATE FINANCE OF IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Singh v. Interstate Finance of Indiana No. 2, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Rans v. Pennsylvania RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.