Legal Opinion

Griffith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated November 19, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

While the plaintiff’s complaint purportedly sounds in negligence and conversion, it is the essence of the action and not the label given to it that is important for determining time limitations (see, Solnick v Whalen, 49 NY2d 224). The plaintiffs action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Solomon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Kaufman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API