Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott M. Peterson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 9, 2001No. 01-1597PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
As part of his plea agreement in this bank-fraud prosecution, Scott Peterson promised to pay restitution for “all losses relating to the offense of conviction and all losses covered by the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.” (Emphasis added.) Normally restitution is limited to loss caused by the offense of conviction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a); Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 110 S.Ct. 1979, 109 L.Ed.2d 408 (1990); United States v. Behrman, 235 F.3d 1049 (7th Cir.2000); United States v. Martin, 195 F.3d 961, 968 (7th…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Gary R. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James R. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Douglas Martin, Melvin Alicea, Hector Carrasco, Victor Alicea, and Victor Matias, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Antonio DonabyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.