Eaton Financial Corp. v. Dewar
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, P.J.
This is an action in contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages under the terms of an instrument of guaranty executed by the defendant.
The defendant, Martha Dewar, denied the execution and delivery of the instrument, which purported to guarantee the performance of two (2) written equipment leases. As additional defenses, the defendant further pleaded lack of consideration and the failure of the plaintiff to exercise such due diligence as was required of it for purposes of mitigating the defendant’s damages.
The matter was submitted to the court upon the following handwritten…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Boston Teachers Union v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Richard D. Kimball Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- NRF Distributors, Inc. v. U.S. Carpet, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990
- Oakwood Living Centers, Inc. v. SaquetMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Eaton Financial Corp. v. DunlaveyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991
- Kaltas v. LaydenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992