Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1988No. 256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence entered after appellant was found guilty by jury of statutory rape, corruption of minors, and criminal conspiracy. Appellant claims that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the Commonwealth’s improper impeachment of a defense witness, and appellant should be granted a new trial because of the improper impeachment; and (2) appellant should be awarded a new trial because the trial court permitted the Commonwealth’s expert witness to testify as to a matter within the exclusive province of the jury. For reasons…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Maconeghy Jr., K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. McIlvaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. McIlvaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API