Legal Opinion

Scarsdale Publishing Co. v. Carter

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 7, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. Action by the Scarsdale Publishing Company-The Colonial Press-against Charles Edgerton Carter. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGoff, J.

On March 13, 1907, this form of contract was signed ;•

“The Colonial Press * * *—Gentlemen; I hereby subscribe and agree to pay for one set of the World’s Great Classics * * * on the following *733terms and conditions: * * * (5) The price shall be total $738 for the set of fifteen volumes, and shall include the 12 building lots specified on the opposite page. Payable $40 monthly. * * * Ohas. Edgerton Carter.
“Received $138 cash payment. Wm. E. Calvert, Representative.
“Make all checks payable to the Colonial Press (opposite page). In consideration of the foregoing contract and the fulfillment of its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . BallardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Marsh v. . DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. State ex rel. Hutchinson v. McGrathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. In re United States Mortg. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People ex rel. Fitzgibbons v. Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oakes Farming Ass'n v. Martinson Bros.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CoughlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. MarcusDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. McKee v. KinevNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Allen v. OverturfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API