Harris v. Marsh
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JAMES C. FOX, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, four black civilian employees and one black former employee of the Unit*317ed States Army at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, initiated this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 et seq. The case is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The complaint alleges that defendants engage in racially discriminatory employment practices in the following areas: (1) promotions; (2) pay for similar or the same work by comparably…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alberto v. GMRI, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Charles E. Wagner, for Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Rosenberg v. University of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Charles E. Wagner, for Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.