Legal Opinion

De Graffenried v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1938No. 4 Div. 304PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of forgery in the second degree.

The instrument alleged to have been, forged was a purported decree of the circuit court of Russell county, Ala., Southern Division, sitting in equity, granting a divorce to Maybell Ingram in the case of Maybell Ingram v. T. A. Ingram. The alleged forged decree bears date of July 11, 1935.

It was claimed by the state, and its evidence tended to show, that on July 11, 1935, no divorce decree had been rendered by the circuit court of Russell county in said cause.

A divorce decree is a subject of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shannon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  3. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Miles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Dolvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Ex Parte HunteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API