Legal Opinion

De Paulo v. City of Albany

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1980PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The arbitrator having found petitioner guilty of releasing an impounded car without authority and filing a false report, among other charges, also found in light of petitioner’s prior good record as a police officer that dismissal was not warranted, and imposed a penalty of suspension without pay, the net effect of which was loss of salary and holiday pay of $14,486. Binghamton Civ. Serv. Forum v City of Binghamton (44 NY2d 23) requires confirmation of that award unless it can be said that in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SerranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Gunning v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Duffy v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Massa v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Matter of Recommendation for Discharge of KelvieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Security & Law Enforcement Employees, District Council 82, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. County of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API