Legal Opinion

Needham v. Demette

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1981No. 8271Published

1Opinion of the Court

STOKER, Judge.

MOTION TO REMAND

The plaintiff-appellee, J. H. Needham, moves to remand this suit to the trial court to enable him to traverse the right of the defendant-appellant, Mark Demette, to proceed with his appeal in forma pauperis. The motion is unopposed. We remand.

On October 29,1980, the appellant moved for and was granted an appeal in forma pauperis. The appellee believes the appellant is able to pay the costs incurred in the suit and seeks to traverse the appellant’s right to proceed in forma pauperis. The appellee filed a motion to remand on January 14, 1981.

The jurisprudence is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oldham v. HooverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Ross v. HatchetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Darby v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Shepard v. ShepardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API