Legal Opinion

Michael M. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1979No. S.F. 23929PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*610Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

We consider the constitutionality of Penal Code section 261.5 (all statutory references are to that code unless otherwise cited), which defines the offense of “unlawful sexual intercourse” as “an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a female not the wife of the perpetrator, where the female is under the age of 18 years.” The crime was formerly called “statutory rape.” We will conclude that while this section does classify both victims and offenders by sex, there is a compelling state interest which justifies the classifications, thus meeting the equal protection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Rockwell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Thomas E. Meloon v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Victor B. Valencia v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API