Davis v. Baker
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill sought to enforce the vendor’s lien on land.
The demurrers of respondent to the bill were properly overruled. The answer and cross-bill were denied by the final decree. The cross-bill claimed sums or damages by way of improvements made on the land, and the amount incurred in recovery of possession of a part thereof from one Baker, who it was alleged was placed in possession by complainant.
The cross-bill was denial of the facts alleged in defense. The rule is that responsive pleading must be germane, to confess and avoid, to answer, or defensive of the antecedent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Williams v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Emens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ex Parte ConradiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beck v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938