Legal Opinion

DeMean v. Ledl

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1990No. 16409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ Harry and Dorothy DeMean appeal from the judgment of the trial court entered in favor of defendant Diana Sue *416Ledl following jury verdict in her favor on plaintiffs’ claim1 that defendant had paid herself more money than a written employment agreement entitled her to. After a motion for new trial was overruled, this appeal followed.

Plaintiffs owned an office building2 in Springfield, Missouri, and had hired defendant in December 1982, pursuant to a written contract, to manage the building. Only one written contract existed. No written modification of the agreement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Park Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Cornell v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Maples v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Boyd v. WimesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Fritts v. Cloud Oak Flooring CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hahn v. TanksleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. White v. Curators of the University of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Doss v. Syntex Agribusiness, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API