Legal Opinion

Wise v. Southern Pac. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1898No. 408PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in question, consisting of 2,200 barrels of an article described in the invoices as “liquid creosote,” was imported from London, England, into the United States, at the port of San Francisco, on the 19th day of March, 1895, by the Southern Pacific Company, and was thereupon entered at the customhouse for immediate consumption. Upon the return of the appraiser of the port, it was classified by the collector as “distilled oil,” dutiable at the rate of 25 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 60 of the tariff act of August 27, 1894 (28 Stat. 50!)). The entries…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Warren Chemical & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. In re Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McEnany v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API