Legal Opinion

People v. Isom

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA1305PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN

¶ 1 In this appeal we construe two statutory provisions governing the sentencing of habitual sex offenders against children: sections 18-3-412(2) and 18-1.3-1004(1)(c), C.R.S.2014. We construe them as requiring a district court to sentence a habitual sex offender against children to an indeterminate prison sentence with a lower term of three times the maximum of the presumptive range, unless the court finds extraordinary aggravating circumstances under section 18-1.3-401, C.R.S.2014, in which case the lower term can be up to six times the maximum of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Vensor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isom v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API