People v. Isom
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE LICHTENSTEIN
¶ 1 In this appeal we construe two statutory provisions governing the sentencing of habitual sex offenders against children: sections 18-3-412(2) and 18-1.3-1004(1)(c), C.R.S.2014. We construe them as requiring a district court to sentence a habitual sex offender against children to an indeterminate prison sentence with a lower term of three times the maximum of the presumptive range, unless the court finds extraordinary aggravating circumstances under section 18-1.3-401, C.R.S.2014, in which case the lower term can be up to six times the maximum of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Vensor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Isom v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017