Stewart v. Coalter
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1DissentStahl, Circuit Judge
With respect, I dissent. I agree with the district court that the evidence was not adequate for a jury to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Stewart was involved in a joint venture to commit murder. See Stewart v. Coalter, 855 F.Supp. 464 (D.Mass.1994). Unlike the majority, I am “loathe to stack inference upon inference in order to uphold the jury’s verdict.” United States v. Valerio, 48 F.3d 58, 64 (1st Cir.1995) (citing Ingram v. United States, 360 U.S. 672, 680, 79 S.Ct. 1314, 1320, 3 L.Ed.2d 1503 (1959)).
For the jury to return a verdict of second-degree murder, it had to find that Good…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. ValerioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.