Mahoning Women's Center v. Hunter
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LAMBROS, District Judge.
This is an action challenging the constitutionality of Chapter 98.00, “Abortions”, of the Revised Code of Ordinances of the City of Youngstown. 1 Plaintiff seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case has been submitted to the Court for resolution of the constitutional issues 2 upon the pleadings, briefs of counsel, and certain stipulated evidence. 3
The gravamen of this case concerns defendants’ right to regulate plaintiff’s performance of first trimester abortions.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Friendship Medical Center, Ltd. And T.R.M. Howard v. The Chicago Board of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Planned Parenthood Association v. FitzpatrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Margaret S. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
- Pueblo v. Duarte MendozaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1980
- Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc. v. City of AkronDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1979
- Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. ReizenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Greenville Women's Clinic v. BryantDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.