Legal Opinion
Keene v. Hale Halsell Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1941No. 9426Published
1Opinion of the Court
118 F.2d 332 (1940)
KEENE et al.
v.
HALE-HALSELL CO. et al.
No. 9426.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 11, 1940.
On Motion for Rehearing January 14, 1941.
On Rehearing March 14, 1941.
R. T. Lipscomb, of Bonham, Tex., for appellants.
W. E. Utterback, of Durant, Okl., and O. D. McReynolds, of Sherman, Tex., for appellees.
Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The petition was filed in the District Court against B. A. Keene, a son of J. T. Keene, and against the widow and other members of the family of J. T. Keene, to establish a large debt claimed against…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cates v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Allan v. Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Dial v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Hughes v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.