Legal Opinion

Oblak v. Armour & Co.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 3, 1941No. 687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

This case was removed from a state court because of the averments in Count 2 of a complaint containing eight counts. It is admitted that a joint cause of action was stated against the nonresident and resident defendant on all of the other counts, but that the resident defendant was not properly joined as to Count 2.

An inspection of the petition shows this to be a fact. One A. E. Gregg was the agent for the corporate defendant in the acts or statements there complained against. The averments show that the resident defendant had nothing to do with the transaction involved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Meeker v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Burmon & Bolonsky, Inc. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1953
  2. White v. E. L. Bruce Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  3. Flournoy v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API