Legal Opinion

Rohrof v. Schulte

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1899No. 18,699PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Prom the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

This action was originally instituted by the appellee on October 31, 1893, against Monigunda Rohrof, Julius Rohrof, Charles A. Brillo, and one Henry Meiger, to set aside the conveyance of 120 acres of real estate situated in Pulaski county, Indiana, and to quiet title thereto; which conveyance, it was alleged, had-been obtained from appellee through the fraud of appellants.

On July 12, 1895, an amended complaint in two paragraphs was filed. Monigunda and Julius Rohrof separately demurred to each paragraph of this complaint. Their demurrers were each overruled, and they answered by a general…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hammond v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Piper v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Talbott v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chesapeake Homes, Inc. v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Studabaker. v. FaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API