Legal Opinion

United States v. Rivera-Santiago

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 2020No. 19-3433Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3433 United States v. Rivera-Santiago UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. United States v. Daniel Lee FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Cynthia Yvette AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. George A. PelenskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API