Legal Opinion

State v. Matos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 26, 1991No. 91-310PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The State appeals from an order dismissing an information. For the following reasons, we reverse.

Israel Matos and a codefendant were charged with trafficking in cocaine. Ma-tos’ counsel subpoenaed the confidential informant for a deposition, scheduled to take place at the State Attorney’s office. The informant appeared as scheduled, but requested the presence of a State Attorney. The prosecutors handling the Matos case were in the middle of a trial and sought to have the deposition rescheduled. The State Attorney’s office contacted the Public Defender’s office, which represented Matos’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PautierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. State v. MenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. VixamarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. State v. T.G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. State v. TGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API